Skip to content
llmwaves

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Xiaomi · released Sep 21, 2026

Open weightsReasoningTool useStructured outputVisionAudio inVideo in

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the flagship foundation model developed by Xiaomi. Built at a scale of over 1T parameters, it is designed to push the ceiling of capability for the most demanding...

Specification

Context window
1.05M
Max output
131K
Knowledge cutoff
Not stated
Parameters
1024.2B
Licence
mit
Serving providers
4
Moderated
No
Uptime
100.0%

Intelligence

46.3

95th percentile

Coding

—

Coding Index

Agentic

—

Agentic Index

Output speed

39 t/s

Median across providers

Latency

805ms

Time to first token

Cost per task

$0.09

Estimated

Benchmarks

Where the score comes from

The Intelligence Index is a composite. These are the underlying evaluations this model was actually measured on.

Evaluation scores

Percentage correct · higher is better

  • AA-LCR (long context)
    86.3%
  • SciCode
    60.9%
  • Humanity's Last Exam
    49.4%

An evaluation missing from this list was not run for this model — it is not a zero.

View as table
EvaluationScore
AA-LCR (long context)86.3%
SciCode60.9%
Humanity's Last Exam49.4%

Against its peers

Intelligence Index · this model highlighted, nearest peers in grey

Peers are the models sitting closest on the Intelligence Index — the set you would realistically choose between.

View as table
ModelIntelligence
Muse Spark 1.348.1
GPT-6 Sol47.6
GPT-5.6 Sol47.0
Grok 4.746.4
MiMo-V2.6-Pro46.3
Qwen3.8 Max (0902)45.4
GLM 5.344.8
Grok 4.644.3

Percentile among all indexed models

Intelligence95th

Pricing

What it costs to run

List prices per million tokens, plus what one representative task works out to.

List price

Input / 1M tokens
$0.435
Output / 1M tokens
$0.87
Cached input / 1M
$0.004
Blended 3:1
$0.544

One task, estimated

$0.09

Input tokens
50,000
Output tokens
80,000
Profile
Reasoning

Estimated from list pricing: 50K input tokens plus 80K output tokens for reasoning models (25K for non-reasoning).

Serving providers

Speed and latency figures are medians across these providers, so a widely-served model reports a blend rather than any single endpoint.