Compare
Four models, one page
Pick the models you are actually choosing between. Every row is scaled within itself, so a bar means something next to its neighbours and nothing across rows.
| Specification | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom ToolsGoogle | Claude Opus 5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Released | Feb 25, 2026 | Jul 24, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 128K |
| Input / 1M | $2 | $5 |
| Output / 1M | $12 | $25 |
| Cost per task | $1.06 | $2.25 |
| Arena Elo | — | 1,393 |
| Serving providers | 1 | 5 |
| Parameters | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Capabilities |
|
|
Metrics side by side
Each row is scaled to the largest value in that row — bars compare within a row, never across rows
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
- Claude Opus 5
Intelligence Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsnot measuredClaude Opus 563.1Coding Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsnot measuredClaude Opus 578.0Agentic Index
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsnot measuredClaude Opus 559.2Output speed
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools59 t/sClaude Opus 587 t/sContext window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools1.05MClaude Opus 51MLatency · lower is better
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools3.7sClaude Opus 51.12sBlended price / 1M · lower is better
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools$4.5Claude Opus 5$10Cost per task · lower is better
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools$1.06Claude Opus 5$2.25
Rows marked “lower is better” still draw a longer bar for a larger number — read the value, not just the length. Arena Elo is in the specification table above instead: it has no meaningful zero, so a bar would flatten the gaps.
View as table
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Claude Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | — | 63.1 |
| Coding Index | — | 78.0 |
| Agentic Index | — | 59.2 |
| Output speed | 59 t/s | 87 t/s |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Latency · lower is better | 3.7s | 1.12s |
| Blended price / 1M · lower is better | $4.5 | $10 |
| Cost per task · lower is better | $1.06 | $2.25 |
Evaluation scores
Percentage correct on a common 0–100% scale
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools
- Claude Opus 5
GPQA Diamond
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsnot measuredClaude Opus 593.2%Humanity's Last Exam
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsnot measuredClaude Opus 554.9%SciCode
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsnot measuredClaude Opus 555.7%τ²-bench
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsnot measuredClaude Opus 542.1%AA-LCR long context
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Toolsnot measuredClaude Opus 575.7%
A missing bar means that evaluation was not run for that model — it is not a zero.
View as table
| Evaluation | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Custom Tools | Claude Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 54.9% |
| SciCode | — | 55.7% |
| τ²-bench | — | 42.1% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | — | — |
| LiveCodeBench | — | — |
| AA-LCR long context | — | 75.7% |
| AIME 2025 | — | — |
Estimated from list pricing: 50K input tokens plus 80K output tokens for reasoning models (25K for non-reasoning).