Skip to content
llmwaves

Compare

Four models, one page

Pick the models you are actually choosing between. Every row is scaled within itself, so a bar means something next to its neighbours and nothing across rows.

SpecificationGLM 5.1Z.aiClaude Opus 5Anthropic
ReleasedApr 7, 2026Jul 24, 2026
Context window205K1M
Max output131K128K
Input / 1M$0.952$5
Output / 1M$2.99$25
Cost per task$0.29$2.25
Arena Elo1,393
Serving providers185
Parameters753.9BUndisclosed
LicencemitProprietary
Capabilities
  • Reasoning
  • Tool use
  • Open weights
  • Reasoning
  • Tool use
  • Vision

Metrics side by side

Each row is scaled to the largest value in that row — bars compare within a row, never across rows

  • GLM 5.1
  • Claude Opus 5
  • Intelligence Index

    GLM 5.1
    41.0
    Claude Opus 5
    63.1
  • Coding Index

    GLM 5.1
    55.8
    Claude Opus 5
    78.0
  • Agentic Index

    GLM 5.1
    30.6
    Claude Opus 5
    59.2
  • Output speed

    GLM 5.1
    67 t/s
    Claude Opus 5
    87 t/s
  • Context window

    GLM 5.1
    205K
    Claude Opus 5
    1M
  • Latency · lower is better

    GLM 5.1
    289ms
    Claude Opus 5
    1.12s
  • Blended price / 1M · lower is better

    GLM 5.1
    $1.46
    Claude Opus 5
    $10
  • Cost per task · lower is better

    GLM 5.1
    $0.29
    Claude Opus 5
    $2.25

Rows marked “lower is better” still draw a longer bar for a larger number — read the value, not just the length. Arena Elo is in the specification table above instead: it has no meaningful zero, so a bar would flatten the gaps.

View as table
MetricGLM 5.1Claude Opus 5
Intelligence Index41.063.1
Coding Index55.878.0
Agentic Index30.659.2
Output speed67 t/s87 t/s
Context window205K1M
Latency · lower is better289ms1.12s
Blended price / 1M · lower is better$1.46$10
Cost per task · lower is better$0.29$2.25

Evaluation scores

Percentage correct on a common 0–100% scale

  • GLM 5.1
  • Claude Opus 5
  • GPQA Diamond

    GLM 5.1
    86.8%
    Claude Opus 5
    93.2%
  • Humanity's Last Exam

    GLM 5.1
    30.1%
    Claude Opus 5
    54.9%
  • SciCode

    GLM 5.1
    43.8%
    Claude Opus 5
    55.7%
  • τ²-bench

    GLM 5.1
    97.7%
    Claude Opus 5
    42.1%
  • Terminal-Bench Hard

    GLM 5.1
    43.2%
    Claude Opus 5not measured
  • AA-LCR long context

    GLM 5.1
    68.0%
    Claude Opus 5
    75.7%

A missing bar means that evaluation was not run for that model — it is not a zero.

View as table
EvaluationGLM 5.1Claude Opus 5
GPQA Diamond86.8%93.2%
Humanity's Last Exam30.1%54.9%
SciCode43.8%55.7%
τ²-bench97.7%42.1%
Terminal-Bench Hard43.2%
LiveCodeBench
AA-LCR long context68.0%75.7%
AIME 2025

Estimated from list pricing: 50K input tokens plus 80K output tokens for reasoning models (25K for non-reasoning).