Compare
Four models, one page
Pick the models you are actually choosing between. Every row is scaled within itself, so a bar means something next to its neighbours and nothing across rows.
| Specification | GLM 4.5VZ.ai | Claude Opus 5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Released | Aug 11, 2025 | Jul 24, 2026 |
| Context window | 66K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 128K |
| Input / 1M | $0.6 | $5 |
| Output / 1M | $1.8 | $25 |
| Cost per task | $0.17 | $2.25 |
| Arena Elo | — | 1,393 |
| Serving providers | 2 | 5 |
| Parameters | 107.7B | Undisclosed |
| Licence | mit | Proprietary |
| Capabilities |
|
|
Metrics side by side
Each row is scaled to the largest value in that row — bars compare within a row, never across rows
- GLM 4.5V
- Claude Opus 5
Intelligence Index
GLM 4.5V6.8Claude Opus 563.1Coding Index
GLM 4.5Vnot measuredClaude Opus 578.0Agentic Index
GLM 4.5Vnot measuredClaude Opus 559.2Output speed
GLM 4.5V42 t/sClaude Opus 587 t/sContext window
GLM 4.5V66KClaude Opus 51MLatency · lower is better
GLM 4.5V2.01sClaude Opus 51.12sBlended price / 1M · lower is better
GLM 4.5V$0.9Claude Opus 5$10Cost per task · lower is better
GLM 4.5V$0.17Claude Opus 5$2.25
Rows marked “lower is better” still draw a longer bar for a larger number — read the value, not just the length. Arena Elo is in the specification table above instead: it has no meaningful zero, so a bar would flatten the gaps.
View as table
| Metric | GLM 4.5V | Claude Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence Index | 6.8 | 63.1 |
| Coding Index | — | 78.0 |
| Agentic Index | — | 59.2 |
| Output speed | 42 t/s | 87 t/s |
| Context window | 66K | 1M |
| Latency · lower is better | 2.01s | 1.12s |
| Blended price / 1M · lower is better | $0.9 | $10 |
| Cost per task · lower is better | $0.17 | $2.25 |
Evaluation scores
Percentage correct on a common 0–100% scale
- GLM 4.5V
- Claude Opus 5
GPQA Diamond
GLM 4.5V57.3%Claude Opus 593.2%Humanity's Last Exam
GLM 4.5V3.5%Claude Opus 554.9%SciCode
GLM 4.5V18.8%Claude Opus 555.7%τ²-bench
GLM 4.5V19.6%Claude Opus 542.1%Terminal-Bench Hard
GLM 4.5V6.8%Claude Opus 5not measuredLiveCodeBench
GLM 4.5V35.2%Claude Opus 5not measuredAA-LCR long context
GLM 4.5V0.0%Claude Opus 575.7%AIME 2025
GLM 4.5V15.3%Claude Opus 5not measured
A missing bar means that evaluation was not run for that model — it is not a zero.
View as table
| Evaluation | GLM 4.5V | Claude Opus 5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.3% | 93.2% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.5% | 54.9% |
| SciCode | 18.8% | 55.7% |
| τ²-bench | 19.6% | 42.1% |
| Terminal-Bench Hard | 6.8% | — |
| LiveCodeBench | 35.2% | — |
| AA-LCR long context | 0.0% | 75.7% |
| AIME 2025 | 15.3% | — |
Estimated from list pricing: 50K input tokens plus 80K output tokens for reasoning models (25K for non-reasoning).